During the fifteenth-millennium Europe we discover a whole lot more rabbis which accept regarding wifebeating to have the objective of studies

During the fifteenth-millennium Europe we discover a whole lot more rabbis which accept regarding wifebeating to have the objective of studies

This approach is illustrated in the collected responsa of Israel Isserlein (Austria, c. 1390–1460). In answer to the question, “Can a man who hears his wife cursing and saying bad things about her mother and father reprove her for this several times? If this does not work, can he then beat her in order to ensure that she does not do this any more?” He answers: “Even though Mordecai [b. Hillel] and R. Simhah wrote that he who beats his wife transgresses the negative precept “not to excess” (pen yosif, Deut. 25:3), and is dealt with very harshly, I disagree with this strict interpretation. I base my interpretation on R. Nahman [ben Jacob, d. c. 320 c.e., Babylonian Lit. (Aramaic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora ] writing in the name of R. Isaac [one of the earliest known Babylonian tannaim, middle of the second century] who wrote that it was permissible to beat a Canaanite slave woman in one’s possession in order to prevent her from transgressing. He of course should not overdo it or else she would be freed. Anyone who is responsible for educating someone under him, and sees that person transgressing, can beat that person to prevent the transgression. He does not have to be brought to court” (Isserlein, Terumat ha-Deshen, Responsum #218).

His feedback are then complicated of the Roentgen

R. Joseph b. Ephraim Caro’s (1488–1575) views on wifebeating are not consistent in his works. In Kesef Mishneh (Caro’s commentary on Maimonides’s Mishneh Torah), Caro seems to agree with Maimonides that the wife’s duties are so important that a husband may beat her if she refuses to perform them. Jonah ben Abraham Gerondi (Sha’arei ha-Teshuvah) who writes that anyone who beats his wife transgresses two negative commandments. Caro suggests excommunicating the perpetrator so that he not transgress the laws of the Torah and that chastising him is too mild a penalty. To support this position he cites R. Simhah of Speyer and agrees with his predecessor that if the husband is a habitual wifebeater, and bruises her (hovel), the court can even cut off his hand. Thus, in BY 74, Caro makes clear that the wife who flees her abusive husband is not a rebellious wife and the husband must either honor her more than himself or divorce her and pay her the money from her marriage contract. It appears, from the sources he cites here that Caro is totally opposed to wifebeating-for any reason. Yet in Beit hookupme.net/spdate-review/ Yosef (BY 154) Caro quotes R. Simhah’s responsum in its entirety, which favors forcing the husband who beats his wife to give her a divorce-even through recourse to the civil courts and writes at the end of this source: “One cannot rely on the writings of R. Simhah and others to force the husband to divorce his wife because none of them rely on the famous decisors (poskim).”

But not, for the Beit Yosef: Even ha-Ezer 74:7–twelve, Caro refers to R

Moses ben Israel Isserles (Rema, 1525 otherwise 1530–1572), the glossator of one’s Shulhan Arukh. He statutes you to definitely, regardless if unwarranted wifebeating justifies persuasive a spouse to help you splitting up their partner “when the she’s the main cause of it, such as, if she curses your or denigrates their mom and dad and you can he scolds the woman quietly basic therefore does not help, then it’s apparent that he’s permitted to defeat this lady and castigate the lady. Of course it is not identified who’s the cause, this new husband isn’t experienced a reliable provider when he states one to she actually is the source and depicts her given that an effective harlot, for everyone women are believed as legislation-abiding” (Darkei Moshe, Tur, Actually ha-Ezer ).

This entry was posted in SPDate hookup app. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *